« September 2004 | Main | November 2004 »
October 21, 2004 | Permalink
Let me get this straight. We have more than ten times as many troops in Iraq as the Brits. We can move as many as the entire British contingency on as much notice as we are giving them for "a limited number". And he really thinks that we're going to believe that this isn't a political ploy before our election? Either he and Tony Blair have been drinking the same Bad Math potion our president has, or they're too scared to say to their bullying friend "er, no, we've had enough of this." The latter seems much more likely.
October 18, 2004 | Permalink
October 12, 2004 | Permalink
Some folks in the Mac community are wondering what this means for Dantz. For example, one blogger says "Retrospect has been a staple in the Mac backup market for as long as I can remember and is used by enterprise and home users alike. Let’s just hope they don’t forget the home users". If the way EMC has handled its acquisition of VMWare in January is any indication, we'll do just fine with Dantz.
VMware's low-end software isn't "home-user", but it is a godsend for tens of thousands of low-end IT folks. I use it every day in the VPNC test lab. A few months after the purchase, VMware came out with a free update to the VMWare Workstation 4.0, numbering it as 4.5; they easily could have called this 5.0 and charged an upgrade fee, but didn't. To me, this is a sign that EMC is happy to have its subsidiaries keep their loyal low-end customer base. The support policies for VMware and Dantz are pretty similar, which means that you'd better hope that the manual and online support forums tell you what you need. But, given that, the software is reliable, useable, and keeps getting better over time.
Update: One IT manager with a lot of history with EMC has a different set of worries about the purchase.
October 12, 2004 | Permalink
The big problem is that PayPal is being completely dishonest about this. There is nothing in the error messages, and nothing on the home page, that says "we're having problems that we know about". The error message even has a "try again" link, indicating that they think the error is transient. After more than a few hours, you would hope they would be a bit more upfront about the problem, but no.
October 12, 2004 | Permalink
One thing I have been wanting for many years is automatic duplex printing. I waste a lot of paper with one-sided printing that really could be done on two sides. So far, the duplex printing has been flawless. I also needed network connectivity so that Judy could print over the wireless from the other room.
MacOSX users will certainly be happy with this one. Brother very clearly treated MacOSX equivalent to Windows on the installer disk. All the instructions were clear. The only fault was that I had to go to the Brother support site to figure out how do duplex printing under OS X, but that's also due to Apple having too many options panels in the Print dialog.
For $350, I'm very pleased.
October 12, 2004 | Permalink
There is a lot more discussion of "spyware" today than there was a few years ago, but most of it is talking about software that is put on your computer by someone you don't know in order to watch a narrow range of what you do. eBlaster, on the other hand, is usually installed by someone you know, and reports almost everything you do to them. In fact, when I ordered my copy from the manufacturer, the salesperson asked me "so, is this for watching your wife or girlfriend, or an employee?". Yeesh.
In fact, both of the cases I worked on were workplace-related. In both cases, someone surreptitiously put a copy on someone else's computer, collected very detailed reports of what the spied-on person did, and was later caught spying. Although there are some legitimate uses for eBlaster, there are many more illegitimate uses. If you look at the ads for eBlaster around the internet, virtually none of them talk about the few legitimate uses; no surprise there.
October 11, 2004 | Permalink
October 05, 2004 | Permalink
Most of us know women who have had breast cancer, although we might not know about the cancer. Many of us have fewer friends because of breast cancer. There's still plenty of research and education to be done.
October 01, 2004 | Permalink
My archives:
2009-12
2009-11
2009-10
2009-09
2009-08
2009-07
2009-06
2009-05
2009-04
2009-03
2009-02
2009-01
2008-12
2008-11
2008-10
2008-09
2008-08
2008-07
2008-06
2008-05
2008-04
2008-03
2008-02
2008-01
2007-12
2007-11
2007-10
2007-09
2007-08
2007-07
2007-06
2007-05
2007-04
2007-03
2007-02
2007-01
2006-12
2006-11
2006-10
2006-09
2006-08
2006-07
2006-06
2006-05
2006-04
2006-03
2006-02
2006-01
2005-12
2005-11
2005-10
2005-09
2005-08
2005-07
2005-06
2005-05
2005-04
2005-03
2005-02
2005-01
2004-12
2004-11
2004-10
2004-09
2004-08
2004-07
2004-06
2004-05
2004-04
2004-03
2004-02
2004-01
2003-12
2003-11
2003-10
2003-09
2003-08
2003-07
2003-06
2003-05
2003-04
2003-03
2003-02
2003-01
2002-12
2002-11
2002-10